The Caldwell Street item sparked some interesting back-and-forth (here’s a link) about whether one-way or two-way makes much of a difference for pedestrian comfort.
One commenter points out that the newly reconfigured intersection of Stonewall and Caldwell is so wide that it isn’t pedestrian friendly (or bicycle friendly or even motorist friendly) at all. Others say sidewalk width and street-level retail are more important.
Here’s my take: They’re all important.
If the sidewalk is narrow (one commenter mentions Seventh Street uptown between Seventh Street Station parking deck and Tryon) pedestrians will be turned off.
If there’s nothing interesting to look at – that is, if you’re walking on a wide sidewalk but you’re going past a vacant corporate plaza, a surface parking lot, a parking deck, a blank office wall, or even windows into office buildings – pedestrians will be turned off.
And if the cars are zooming past, as they tend to do on one – way streets when the lights are timed to let you cruise at 35 and hit them all green – then pedestrians will be turned off.
So reverting one-way to two-way is a good first step but if it’s the only step it may be a waste of time. I continue to maintain that street-level retail shopping (or as the late jeweler and City Council member Al Rousso used to cry, “Window-shopping! We need window-shopping!”) is what’s key for uptown, and it’s going to be incredibly difficult to achieve because:
• We’ve spent two decades demolishing storefront buildings until the few that remain are too far from each other to create any retail synergy.
• The city’s uptown zoning still allows new development without street-front retail. It requires ground-floor retail, not street-front. Thus we get Founder’s Hall and the shops inside office towers. To window-shop requires leaving the sidewalks and streets entirely. Unless you’re in an urban scene as dense with stores and lively sidewalks as, say, New York or Paris, that’s anti-urban.
