High growth city = poorer city?

I came across an intriguing new study, courtesy of the HoustonTomorrow website, which headlined it, “Fast metro growth =lower incomes: Study links poverty, growth.” The study itself, “Relationship between Growth and Prosperity in 100 Largest U.S. Metropolitan Areas,” by consulting firm Fodor & Associates, looked at the fastest-growing and slowest-growing U.S. metro areas 2000-2009, and looked at per capita income, unemployment rate, and poverty rate. It found that faster growth rates were associated with lower incomes, greater income declines, and higher poverty rates.

Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord and Raleigh-Cary were among the fastest-growing metros the study looked at – no surprise. The report’s writers say it throws some cold water on the often-stated belief on the part of many elected and business officials that growing fast is an automatic route to prosperity.

One caveat: In a quick skim of the report I didn’t see enough data to tell me whether it had taken into account the fact that many of the fastest-growing cities in the South and the West were poorer to start with, and the slower-growing cities in the North and Midwest were places with higher pay (manufacturing, unions, etc.) but less economic growth, hence less population growth. In other words, does the study show causality or just correlation? If any academics or others have time to pore through the report and offer an analysis, it would be welcome.

A sidewalk legend that just won’t die

Instead of posting this comment on the previous sidewalk piece, “Sidewalks: Fines? Red China? Remove fences?” I want to highlight it here, in hopes of killing some out-of-date misinformation that has a remarkable shelf life in local memory.

The fact that people continue to be confused about whether the city will repair a sidewalk or makes property owners pay for repairs is an indicator, I think, of how lame the city’s overall sidewalk policies and advocacy have been. This shouldn’t be read as an indictment of Charlotte Department of Transportation’s pedestrian program manager, Vivian Coleman. [Note, 1:40 p.m. Jan. 5: Coleman has been promoted and is now Transportation Planner.] She has to swim upstream in a city of nonpedestrians and a city government that is only oh-so-slowly concluding pedestrians do, after all, deserve consideration. Indeed, CDOT may now be more enlightened on that matter than many other local agencies. (Can you say, “Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools”?)

Here’s the comment, sent from “Bruce Keith” sent about 10 p.m. Monday (Jan. 3):
If a sidewalk fails or breaks and the homeowner doesn’t pay to repair it, the city will pave it with Asphalt, even in Historic Districts. This fence most likely is in the right of way but the city should maintain ALL of its infrastructure and ENFORCE all of its ordinances. This fence should be moved or removed and the city should maintain the walk, as it is Public Property in a Public ROW [right-of-way].
Commenter Keith is about 10 years out of date on that repair issue. CDOT used to charge property owners part of repair costs and, if owners wouldn’t pay, the patch was cheap asphalt. But it changed its sidewalk repair policy in 2001. “Just as CDOT repairs potholes for cars, broken sidewalks are repaired to maintain quality facilities for pedestrians,” CDOT spokeswoman Linda Durrett wrote me in an e-mail.

Plenty of Charlotteans don’t realize the repair policy changed, and many repeat that bit of lore, maybe because some of those old asphalt patches are still around? In any event, if you want to read more about sidewalk repair policies, here’s a link.

You’ll note I didn’t address the issue of rights-of-way and whether the city can legally require people to clear off sidewalks in the city (or state) right-of-way. I’m still checking on the legal issues. The city also expects property owners to mow the grass in planting strips, an expectation that doesn’t seem to bring out nearly the hostility as asking people to keep leaves, snow, ice, etc. off their sidewalks. Go figure.

And the comment about rollout trash bins? Yet another reason that those horrible back-of-curb sidewalks are and were an abomination. Thank goodness the city no longer allows them to be built that way. But if you’re in an area that’s stuck with them, you have little choice but to clog the sidewalks with them, and, if you’re thoughtful, haul them back in as soon as you can.

Sidewalks: Fines? Red China? Remove fences?

A commenter to my previous post, who read the Sunday editorial “Urban streets will need urban sidewalks” correctly nailed it with his/her suspicion, based on the Runnymede Lane photo that ran with it, at left, that I was its author. (I’m among the four people at the Observer who write the unsigned editorials on behalf of the editorial board.) And he/she raises one of the trickiest issues that city transportation officials are going to have to confront: If you want to encourage people to walk, how can you ensure that sidewalks are kept clear? Read the comment in full, at the end of this.

Currently, property owners are expected to keep sidewalks clear. But the city’s ordinances are murky about what the city can/can’t order property owners to and it’s generally silent on what punishment is allowed.

The commenter raises the specter of Red China and its cultural education camps. But rather than having an “education czar” (oops, those czars were in Russia, not China), he/she suggests the city should remove the fence shown in the photo. Er, wouldn’t that be taking private property?

The commenter asks if I’ve ever called CDOT (Charlotte Department of Transportation) for enforcement. As a matter of fact I have called them about that messy stretch of sidewalk off and on for 10 years. After I wrote a June article about sidewalks (“Walk this way. If you can”) with photos and called CDOT officials for information, the Runnymede sidewalk was finally cleared. I’m not sure whether CDOT contacted property owners or the publicity alerted them. But in the six months since then, the sidewalk has clogged again with leaves.

If you don’t want an education czar, do you want to spend city taxpayer money on a fleet of clean-sidewalk enforcers? Hire people to monitor telephone or email complaints, dispatch inspectors and – if warranted – cite or otherwise notify property owners? And if you really want walkable sidewalks, should you wait for complaints or be pro-active in keeping them clear?

Currently, CDOT says it responds when people complain, but in my experience, my complaints haven’t seemed to get much attention unless I put something in the newspaper with photos. I can’t imagine they are hopping to it when people without access to printing presses or editorial pages complain.

But the underlying question is: Should the city beef up its attempts to keep sidewalks clear? And if the answer is “yes,” (which is how I’d answer) what’s the best way? Cite and fine property owners? Use city staff to clean sidewalks?

Here’s the comment about sidewalks from the previous post :
I read the editorial in today’s (Jan. 2) Observer about urban sidewalks, to which Mary obviously contributed. (The photo of that leaf-cluttered Runnymede Lane sidewalk, which Mary has long bemoaned, gave it away). Frankly Mary, I agree with much of that editorial. I’m a retiree, live in a densely populated part of South Charlotte, and make good use of sidewalks as both pedestrian and bicyclist. My current sidewalk travel has been primarily for exercise, but given the ever-escalating cost of gasoline, I recently bought a small cart in which to haul groceries and other purchases behind my bike. I appreciate that our city provides an alternative that will keep me trim, save me some money, and help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. But a sentence in that editorial has me puzzled. In mentioning that sidewalks outside of center city are often impassable, you or another editorialist ask “How can property owners be taught to keep them clean?” What!? Have the Red Chinese finally overrun this city? Will local government be expanded to add an education czar with the authority to haul affluent Runnymede residents off to a remote training camp in the mountains where they’ll be taught a lesson on how to rake leaves? I don’t think the Powell Bill, which helps fund sidewalk maintenance in Charlotte via taxed motor fuel, allows for that. In the case of Runnymede Lane, a better solution may be for the city to remove that tall, solid-wood fence shown in the editorial photo. It appears to be suspiciously close to the sidewalk, probably encroaching on city right-of-way. Have you ever called CDOT for enforcement? Fence removal will eliminate the “out-of-sight out-of-mind” strategy of the usually neat but sidewalk-hating Runnymedians. They – or their lawn service – will be out there with a leaf blower in a flash. Unfortunately, you can’t force folks to be thoughtful and responsible – unless you are part of the Red Chinese bureaucracy. In Charlotte, you have to hit them where they feel it – in their pocketbooks. Just call 311. And if the city doesn’t take care of the problem, the Observer should ask why we are paying bloated salaries and retirement benefits to government officials and not getting anything in return.

Sidewalks: Fines? Red China? Remove fences?

A commenter to my previous post, who read the Sunday editorial “Urban streets will need urban sidewalks” correctly nailed it with his/her suspicion, based on the Runnymede Lane photo that ran with it, at left, that I was its author. (I’m among the four people at the Observer who write the unsigned editorials on behalf of the editorial board.) And he/she raises one of the trickiest issues that city transportation officials are going to have to confront: If you want to encourage people to walk, how can you ensure that sidewalks are kept clear? Read the comment in full, at the end of this.

Currently, property owners are expected to keep sidewalks clear. But the city’s ordinances are murky about what the city can/can’t order property owners to and it’s generally silent on what punishment is allowed.

The commenter raises the specter of Red China and its cultural education camps. But rather than having an “education czar” (oops, those czars were in Russia, not China), he/she suggests the city should remove the fence shown in the photo. Er, wouldn’t that be taking private property?

The commenter asks if I’ve ever called CDOT (Charlotte Department of Transportation) for enforcement. As a matter of fact I have called them about that messy stretch of sidewalk off and on for 10 years. After I wrote a June article about sidewalks (“Walk this way. If you can”) with photos and called CDOT officials for information, the Runnymede sidewalk was finally cleared. I’m not sure whether CDOT contacted property owners or the publicity alerted them. But in the six months since then, the sidewalk has clogged again with leaves.

If you don’t want an education czar, do you want to spend city taxpayer money on a fleet of clean-sidewalk enforcers? Hire people to monitor telephone or email complaints, dispatch inspectors and – if warranted – cite or otherwise notify property owners? And if you really want walkable sidewalks, should you wait for complaints or be pro-active in keeping them clear?

Currently, CDOT says it responds when people complain, but in my experience, my complaints haven’t seemed to get much attention unless I put something in the newspaper with photos. I can’t imagine they are hopping to it when people without access to printing presses or editorial pages complain.

But the underlying question is: Should the city beef up its attempts to keep sidewalks clear? And if the answer is “yes,” (which is how I’d answer) what’s the best way? Cite and fine property owners? Use city staff to clean sidewalks?

Here’s the comment about sidewalks from the previous post :
I read the editorial in today’s (Jan. 2) Observer about urban sidewalks, to which Mary obviously contributed. (The photo of that leaf-cluttered Runnymede Lane sidewalk, which Mary has long bemoaned, gave it away). Frankly Mary, I agree with much of that editorial. I’m a retiree, live in a densely populated part of South Charlotte, and make good use of sidewalks as both pedestrian and bicyclist. My current sidewalk travel has been primarily for exercise, but given the ever-escalating cost of gasoline, I recently bought a small cart in which to haul groceries and other purchases behind my bike. I appreciate that our city provides an alternative that will keep me trim, save me some money, and help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. But a sentence in that editorial has me puzzled. In mentioning that sidewalks outside of center city are often impassable, you or another editorialist ask “How can property owners be taught to keep them clean?” What!? Have the Red Chinese finally overrun this city? Will local government be expanded to add an education czar with the authority to haul affluent Runnymede residents off to a remote training camp in the mountains where they’ll be taught a lesson on how to rake leaves? I don’t think the Powell Bill, which helps fund sidewalk maintenance in Charlotte via taxed motor fuel, allows for that. In the case of Runnymede Lane, a better solution may be for the city to remove that tall, solid-wood fence shown in the editorial photo. It appears to be suspiciously close to the sidewalk, probably encroaching on city right-of-way. Have you ever called CDOT for enforcement? Fence removal will eliminate the “out-of-sight out-of-mind” strategy of the usually neat but sidewalk-hating Runnymedians. They – or their lawn service – will be out there with a leaf blower in a flash. Unfortunately, you can’t force folks to be thoughtful and responsible – unless you are part of the Red Chinese bureaucracy. In Charlotte, you have to hit them where they feel it – in their pocketbooks. Just call 311. And if the city doesn’t take care of the problem, the Observer should ask why we are paying bloated salaries and retirement benefits to government officials and not getting anything in return.

Holiday reading, til Dec. 27

I’ll be on vacation until Monday Dec. 27, so you’ll have to make do. To keep you busy ’til then, here are a few links to interesting stories:

• Greensboro’s Kristen Jeffers writes in Grist.org about the distressing lack of black, female “urbanists.” “When I look around,” she writes, “I mostly see only one type of person associated with the urbanist label: young, white, and male. … The word ‘urban,’ when it’s associated with African-Americans, is often synonymous with housing projects, poverty, and the poisoned legacy of urban renewal. ” She’s an MPA student at UNC Greensboro concentrating in community and economic development. (Here’s her blog, The Black Urbanist.)

• The state of Oregon is considering a measure to ban single-use plastic checkout bags.

• Fort Worth’s City Council has pulled the plug on further study of a downtown streetcar. This appears to mean the city won’t accept a $25 million federal grant. (Hey, wonder if any of that now-available streetcar money might float Charlotte’s way?)

• A study at University of California-Berkeley finds that at any given moment there are at least 500 million EMPTY parking spaces in the U.S. Says Donald Shoup, a UCLA urban planning professor and author of the book “The High Cost of Free Parking.” “[Parking] is the single biggest land use in any city. It’s kind of like dark matter in the universe, we know it’s there, but we don’t have any idea how much there is.”

• CNN puts Charlotte on the map. Literally. In a piece, “Can streetcars save America’s cities?

• Utah mom cited for neglect for letting her kid walk to school by himself. Note: The school system, in budget cuts, took away his school bus. Coming soon to a CMS school near you?

Holiday reading, til Dec. 27

I’ll be on vacation until Monday Dec. 27, so you’ll have to make do. To keep you busy ’til then, here are a few links to interesting stories:

• Greensboro’s Kristen Jeffers writes in Grist.org about the distressing lack of black, female “urbanists.” “When I look around,” she writes, “I mostly see only one type of person associated with the urbanist label: young, white, and male. … The word ‘urban,’ when it’s associated with African-Americans, is often synonymous with housing projects, poverty, and the poisoned legacy of urban renewal. ” She’s an MPA student at UNC Greensboro concentrating in community and economic development. (Here’s her blog, The Black Urbanist.)

• The state of Oregon is considering a measure to ban single-use plastic checkout bags.

• Fort Worth’s City Council has pulled the plug on further study of a downtown streetcar. This appears to mean the city won’t accept a $25 million federal grant. (Hey, wonder if any of that now-available streetcar money might float Charlotte’s way?)

• A study at University of California-Berkeley finds that at any given moment there are at least 500 million EMPTY parking spaces in the U.S. Says Donald Shoup, a UCLA urban planning professor and author of the book “The High Cost of Free Parking.” “[Parking] is the single biggest land use in any city. It’s kind of like dark matter in the universe, we know it’s there, but we don’t have any idea how much there is.”

• CNN puts Charlotte on the map. Literally. In a piece, “Can streetcars save America’s cities?

• Utah mom cited for neglect for letting her kid walk to school by himself. Note: The school system, in budget cuts, took away his school bus. Coming soon to a CMS school near you?

How’s NCDOT doing in reducing emissions? Er …

It’s distressing to see North Carolina ranks a dismal 37 in a new report assessing whether state transportation policies support reduced motor-vehicle emissions, which cause pollution as well as affecting global climate change.

The report, released Tuesday, is “Getting Back on Track: Aligning State Transportation Policy with Climate Change Goals,” from two environmentally oriented nonpartisan, nonprofits, the National Resources Defence Council and Smart Growth America. It focuses on transportation because it’s the second largest emitter of climate-changing pollutants after power plants.

Although every president starting with George H.W. Bush has called for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the report notes, nationwide emission rates have gone up 27 percent from 1990 to 2007. While more efficient vehicles and cleaner fuels could mean large GHG emissions reductions in coming years, the report says, a projected 50 percent increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by 2030 will undermine those savings. “Without bringing down transportation emissions, it will be impossible to achieve the reductions scientists have deemed necessary to avoid the worst effects of climate change,” the report says.

It looked at which states have adopted transportation policies and goals to help reduce GHG. No state got a higher grade than B-, most scored lower than D. Most states, it found, make decisions that will likely increase emissions.

The federal government did not get off unscathed. The report points out that while the feds require a 50 percent local match for public transit projects, highway and bridge projects usually get 80 percent federal money, with only a 20 percent local match. Also, a large proportion of federal aid funding is divvied up according to formulas based on VMT, fuel consumption and highway lane miles. States that work to reduce VMT and fuel consumption would be penalized when it comes to getting federal money.

California, Maryland and New Jersey topped the state rankings. All of North Carolina’s neighbors scored better: South Carolina was No. 28, Virginia 12, Tennessee 25. At a telephone news conference Tuesday, NCDOT’s Jim Westmoreland, the deputy secretary for transit, defended the state, saying, “We’re a definite work in progress.” He noted that projections are for VMT in North Carolina to double by 2030. That will make it even more important to promote mass transit and other travel modes. Westmoreland noted the state’s high-speed passenger rail investments, and gave a shout-out to Charlotte’s successful light rail line.

And he pointed out that the N.C. Board of Transportation in July 2009 adopted a Complete Streets Policy, which means it considers pedestrians and bicycles as well as motor vehicles in designing new projects.

All to the good. Let us hope the next such survey finds North Carolina pushing into the top 10, instead of trailing our fellow Carolina to the South.
Photo credit: 2002 Observer file photo of Charlotte skyline, by John D. Simmons

Foxx’s 3 C’s – including consolidation

Mayor Anthony Foxx made a series of proposals, some of them sure to be controversial, in his State of the City speech this morning – his first since being sworn in as mayor last December. Among them:

• He reiterated his belief that city and county governments should ultimately consolidate. “It will never happen if we don’t start now,” he said.

• He’ll convene a regional group early next year to develop a plan for bringing the region’s fractured transportation planning organizations. Most metro regions have one regional transportation planning body. The Charlotte region has six, or if you count Hickory, seven. “The time has come,” Foxx said, and said he wanted the regional group to come away with “concrete steps.” He said: “The time has come.”

• He wants to create a board of experts who’ll take a comprehensive look at after-school programs and create a competitive grant-making process, akin to the federal Race to the Top for state school systems. The city still funds some after-school programs, but has cut its funding to others.

• Charlotte City Council, he said, should be prepared to support state legislative agendas of fellow elected bodies such as Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. He endorsed raising the cap (now at 100) on the number of charter schools the state allows. And with CMS facing “staggering cuts,” he said, the City Council shouldn’t have reduced its funding for school resource officers and school crossing guards. (Here’s reporter Steve Harrison’s article on that.)

The city in the coming year should focus on what he called the 3 C’s: Consolidation, Collaboration (i.e. regionally) and Children.

It was obviously not the sort of speech you’d have heard from former Mayor Pat McCrory, the seven-term Republican who shied away from speechifying about public schools in general and CMS in particular. (That may have made him the wiser politician, of course. CMS in general is a topic that gets many people’s blood boiling, from both ends of the political spectrum.)

I saw no one in the crowd I recognized as a Republican, and plenty I recognized as Democrats, but of course people don’t have to wear badges. So while Foxx offered congratulations to incoming N.C. House Speaker Thom Tillis of Cornelius, and incoming Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger, both Republicans, and even threw them a political bone with the recommendation to lift the charter school cap, I wonder if that will do much for bipartisanship. “We look forward to working with you,” Foxx said. Then he quipped, “And we desperately hope you (the legislature) won’t take any of our money.”

But Tillis wasn’t there. Nor were any Republican elected officials.

Foxx ended his talk with a nice little vignette, asking the crowd to recall the cathedral builders of old. Some workers, he said, spent their whole lives just moving stones from one place to another, and never lived to see the cathedral they were building. As a city, he said, “If we don’t move those stones to the proper place the cathedral will never get built.”

An urbanist’s gift-book list

Planetizen.com has released its annual list of the Top 10 urban planning books. Take a look.
I haven’t yet read and thus can’t in all honesty recommend any of them but one – “What We See: Advancing the Observations of Jane Jacobs,” a collection of essays by well-known urban writers looking at cities and the issues cities face. The idea was to put into practice Jacobs’ technique of looking at the real world and how it functions instead of letting your view be clouded by insisting on applying theories, whether of planning of economics, regardless of whether the facts showed something different.

Mary Rowe’s piece on getting to know Jacobs, who died in 2006 in her adopted home of Toronto, is filled with warmth and close-eyed observation.

Roberta Brandes Gratz writes, in vigorous prose, about the crucial importance to “green” building of preserving buildings instead of demolishing. Ans she quotes one of my favorite passages from Jacobs’ masterwork, “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” about how creative entrepreneurs and new business start-ups must have the inexpensive space that new buildings simply can’t offer:

“Cities need old buildings so badly it is probably impossible for vigorous streets and districts to grow without them. By old buildings I mean not museum-piece old buildings, not old buildings in an excellent and expensive state of rehabilitation – although these make fine ingredients – but also a good lot of plain, ordinary, low-value old buildings, including some rundown old buildings. … Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings.”


I haven’t finished the book; it’s a good one to dip into when you need an urban-writing fix.

If you missed it, here’s the 2010 Planetizen book list. I can recommend Anthony Flint’s “Wrestling with Moses” as an exceptionally readable history/biography of New York’s parks/highways/everything czar (and you thought Obama’s czars had too much power?), and Jacobs and their struggles to shape New York. In addition, “The Smart Growth Manual” by Andres Duany and Jeff Speck is a readable little handbook with simple prescriptions, such as “Design public places around existing trees,” and ” Designate civic sites in each neighborhood.” Under the heading, “Price parking according to its value,” is this: “Of course there is never enough parking. If pizza were free, would there ever be enough pizza?”

Walmart goes urban? Mayors rule? And buses return

While I was eating Thanksgiving turkey and then fighting (and losing) a cold/cough, the interesting links have stacked up in my inbox as thick as shoppers at the Apple store last weekend.

1. Here’s a piece about Walmart’s plans to – hold onto your reindeer antler-hat – build an urban-style store in Washington. It’ll have five floors, with small-format retail lining the H Street sidewalk, Walmart behind, parking underground, and 315 apartments on the upper floors. The behemoth retailer plans several other DC stores, none as urban as that one.

I’ll pause here to let SouthEnders brag about the Lowe’s on South Boulevard, which wraps the back end of the big-box in condos, has small-scale retail on the street, and has rooftop parking. But that project, though hailed nationally, still has some weirdness, such as that very odd, one-story building at Iverson Way and South Boulevard. It appears to be empty. Is it a store? If so, for whom? And the big ole surface parking lot is still a big-ole surface parking lot, though a bit smaller than it would be without the rooftop parking. But even with those quibbles it’s about a zillion times more urban than anything Walmart has done here.

2. Here’s a look, pegged to the climate talks now under way in Cancun, at the role mayors expect to play in the fight against global climate change: “But as nations dither, hundreds of cities are pledging to rein in emissions, slash energy usage, and turn to renewable energy sources. Mayors say they see greater urgency than national leaders do.” Which only makes sense. Mayors are the ones who have to deal most directly with so many problems that have little to do with partisan politics: how to fill potholes, cope with traffic, build/maintain parklands, etc. (And if you’re among the declining number of climate-change deniers, you might ask yourself why you’re choosing to disbelieve the vast majority of the world’s climate scientists and instead prefer to believe partisan politicians, right-wing pundits and think-tanks underwritten by fossil-fuel companies. I mean, you’re free to believe those sources. But, um, why?)

3. While most eyes have been focusing on either road-building, high-speed rail plans or urban mass transit proposals, the N.C. Department of Transportation has quietly expanded intercity bus service. In October it began running daily two routes connecting Charlotte (the uptown Greyhound station on West Trade) with Boone and with Fayetteville. The Mountaineer North/South leaves Appalachian State University at 9:15 a.m. daily, arrives in Charlotte at 12:50 p.m., stopping in Lenoir, Hickory, Lincolnton and Gastonia. The return bus leaves Charlotte at 6 p.m. The Fayetteville route (Queen City Connector) stops in Laurinburg, Rockingham, Wadesboro and Monroe. The return leaves Charlotte at 6 p.m.

Coach America operates the buses with NCDOT funds. Tickets are $8 to $20, depending. And yes, the buses have WiFi, NCDOT tells us. For ticket information, click here.

Buses aren’t as beloved as trains, but they serve an important role in transportation. Just ask a college kid who’s counting pennies, or an elderly grandparent who wants to come to Charlotte but doesn’t want to drive in the big-city traffic.